Tuesday, November 15, 2011

Ron Paul = The Right Choice

Twenty-five years from now when historians look back, they will acknowledge that this was the moment in time, this was the critical juncture in our country's history when angry Americans forcefully stepped up and yelled... "No more!" No more of the politician's rhetoric. No more to the free spending of hard working Americans money. No more to the debt that had made our country a pariah to the world. No more to a war riddled world that had taken the lives of thousands of heroic American men and women.

Historians will find that 2011-2012 was the turning point for our great country. They will recognize that caring, proud Americans voted for the candidate that had the country's best interest at heart, even though he may not have been the prettiest talking head nor the most polished. They will realize that for the first time, in a groundswell of patriotism, Americans voted for someone other than the candidates that were foisted upon them by the media's frenetic, money driven campaign to hold sway over the American people's minds. They will acknowledge that Americans everywhere, of all races, creeds and color, came together and said "No more!"

When historians discuss this point in American history, they will speak of how the American public, with a loud and raucous roar, took back the United States of America with an anger and sense of righteousness that hadn't been felt in decades. How we empowered ourselves as a people - united in a proud stand - to tell Washington that "this is enough!" They will talk of how a mild mannered man of high intellect and higher morals, stepped up and with the quiet voice of one, said "No more!" And that quiet voice of one... was heard by millions!

Here and now is when we, as a people - black, white, yellow, brown, poor, rich, city dwellers and rural folks alike - stood hand-in-hand as one and demanded that Washington do our bidding and not the reverse. We demanded that they cut spending. We demanded change. We demanded they listen to us or be removed from their office and others put in their place. And after the election those same people in Washington, for the first time in many years, realized that We The People run this country, not them. That the gravy train was over. That we were saying "No more!"

Historians will see how the media attempted to give us only two choices for the presidency - and how we saw through the ruse. They will understand how the media continued to see us as sheep being led to slaughter - how they woefully underestimated us - and how we stood our ground - proud, strong and ready to fight. And in the end they will see that the politicians in Washington, the media and the world believed we were ignorant, mindless souls who would quietly follow along - and oh, what a foolish mistake of conceit that was!

Finally they will talk of how Ron Paul was voted into office, even though he was dismissed, demeaned and degraded by the media and Washington politicos alike. How the American people took a stand and stuck to their guns and fooled them all - not allowing the bombardment of mindless drivel from the airwaves to sway us in our march, hand-in-hand, across America to the promised land, where We The People sent our collective, strong as steel voice to the politicians that we run this great country, and not lifetime politicians who care only of themselves, of money and of power.

Ron Paul can and will take us home. He will take America back - with common sense -with dignity - with intelligence. And when you step into that voting booth, vote with your heart, vote for your country, vote for your fellow Americans. Don't be swayed by the polls or the rhetoric that comes slithering like a snake in the grass out of Washington, as this is what they count on - that Americans don't want to waste a vote on someone who the media tells them can't win.

If we stand strong - if we fight the good fight - if we say "No more!" We can take back our country. We can take back our heritage. We can take back this land from those who care only for themselves.

Vote RON PAUL and and tell Washington "NO MORE!" And the beauty of it is... they will never see us coming.  Don't sway, don't falter, stay strong!

VOTE RON PAUL

Sunday, May 15, 2011

Auto Racing is Dying

Its a shame that one of the oldest and grandest of sports, Auto Racing, is dying a slow and agonizing death.  Technology has run away with a sport that was built on a visceral, seat-of-the-pants feel and eyeball shaking, ear shattering noise and turned it into a computer based, aero driven concoction of speed and machine, making the driver less and less important.

The Indianapolis Motor Speedway is hosting the 100th anniversary of the "500" this year and so far, it has been nothing more than a blip on the radar as far as the media is concerned - And this is a great shame.   With Nascar down in attendance and the Indy racing series struggling, the blame has been placed right square on the economy, and although in many ways this is true, the downturn in racing has been going on much longer than the last two or three years.

With the IndyCar Series, there was a fallout with fans that dates back to the mid-90's when Tony George engineered a split between his race track - the Indianapolis Motor Speedway, the home of the Indy 500 - and CART, which tore apart a thriving series.  With Nascar it has been a slow decline that started with a change in major sponsorship - Winston Cup to the Nextel Cup - and rules changes that included the addition of "The Chase" and a move away from actual cars towards cars that are race designed but have no real connection with anything anyone drives today.

For me, the bottom line is this.  If you are driving a race car, of any type, and you don't lift going through a turn, you aren't racing... you are just a great big slot car.  At Indy and the high banked tracks the IndyCar series runs on, the drivers are, for the most part, flat out all the way around the track.  This is not what racing is about.  Somehow, somewhere, someone in charge dropped the ball.

Indy used to be about speed, the incremental rise in m.p.h. year after year, the anticipation of a new record, the awe at the drivers abilities and courage and the smiles at a builders ingenuity and sometimes, flat out cheating.

Then during the 60's, a rebel designer named Jim Hall, started experimenting with wings and aero packages that put more and more weight on down force than anything else.  Push down hard enough on a car and you could drive it as fast as the motor could take it. 

He started with sports cars and his own design called the Chaparral, which initially had a small upturned bill at the back of the car that forced the air over it, putting down-force on the rear wheels, adding traction.


This was followed by a huge wing that stood above the car at the back and eventually moved to a wing that went from flat level down the stretch to standing straight up with the application of brakes, and then to a vacuum motor that sucked air out from under the car, creating a vacuum to hold the car down.


The wings quickly spread thru-out Formula One and IndyCar and by the mid 70's speeds has risen by nearly 50 mph from the mid-60's.

Jim Clark (seated in car) with the designer of the Lotus Colin Chapman kneeling with his arm on the car - Indy 1965
Formula One circa 1969
At Indy the cars developed complete aero packages that made the whole car a down-force generating animal, applying enough down-force (4500 lbs) to allow the car to drive upside down, if anyone had a need to.   This allowed drivers to keep their foot flat on the floor through all four turns at Indy and most of the other tracks they drove on.

Indy 1975
 This took away from the drivers ability and courage to go faster and harder than another driver.  In days of yore, you had to lift going into a corner, tap the brakes, get the car down to a manageable speed and keep the car pointing in the right direction.  At the end of a race, you had a decision to make... Can I go deeper into the corner before lifting  or braking than the other driver?  Do I have the skill needed to keep the beast at bay and the courage to make the pass?

Al Unser Jr.  Indy 1992
Now a driver has his foot on the floor and there is nothing else he can do.  If he is faster, great.  If not, oh well, nothing he can do except aim it.

Nascar has been moving away from cars that looked like real cars, since the early 90's.  The cars have vertical sides, no side mirrors, air dams that keep air from going under the car, and more and more down-force.  At Daytona and Talladega, it is as far away from real racing as you can get.  Restrictor plates and aerodynamics that keep the cars close, artificially so, and no one can pass without the help of another driver.  Anything about this that resembles anything close to racing as we knew it?

Nascar 1978
Its time for IndyCars and Nascar to move away from technology, slow the cars down and let them race.  Imagine an IndyCar from 1965 with all the available safety updates, but a car that has to be driven, not aimed.  Speeds in the high 190's and three hour "500's" again.

A Nascar car that allows drivers to pass, draft and drive on a big oval like they do on the short tracks.

Take away the aero packages, have maximum wind tunnel numbers.  For IndyCars, stock block motors, pistons crank and rods.  Head work optional.  Set a higher minimum weight so that cars don't have to be built with NASA spec materials.  If they did this, how many cars could be built in professional garages across the country, just like way back when.  If you don't have to spend millions on wind tunnel time, computer cad designers and such, you have more people involved... just build the car to the spec, build your own engine and have a go.

Technology is not a bad thing in auto racing when it helps safety, but speed, just for the sake of speed is not what the sport is about, although those that run them would have you think so.

It will take a visionary to realize what's wrong with motor-sports and lead the way back to real racing.

It's such a shame.